Popular Post

Sanctions Against Iran

Sanctions Against Iran. sanctions#39; against Iran to
  • sanctions#39; against Iran to



  • LagunaSol
    Apr 18, 05:06 PM
    The galaxy tab looks different to the phone 3gs from my experience with it.
    It is lacking a chrome bezel & the sides are flattened, black matte plastic and lacks a physical "home" button.

    They are similar but far from identical.

    If only I had a white Galaxy Tab and a white iPhone 3GS, I'd lay them face down next to each other and take a pic so you could see just how "identical" they really are.

    But the non-Apple world is used to derivative design (or just blind to it): behold Microsoft's white Dell Optiplex, the Xbox 360:

    http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2006/03/360_vs_dell.jpg





    Sanctions Against Iran. UN sanctions against Iran,
  • UN sanctions against Iran,



  • Amazing Iceman
    Apr 25, 10:03 AM
    Yeah, you're right. We should all be geo-tagged from birth and have cameras implanted in our eyes so that the Government can catch bad people. We have nothing to hide, afterall.

    They already do that without our knowledge, so why keep worrying about it?
    As long as they know where we are when we need help, who cares?

    All those street cameras, Toll transponders, Tolls with license plate recognition, cellular tower triangulation, Telephone tapping, Stake outs, curious neighbors watching you (potential witnesses), etc.; that's a lot of tracking going on there... that's without counting on Satellite surveillance available to the government to use whenever they need it.

    So the fact is that:
    :eek: THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS ABSOLUTE PRIVACY!!! :eek:





    Sanctions Against Iran. Image. Canada announced new
  • Image. Canada announced new



  • Hairball
    Mar 26, 09:54 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8G4)

    I hope I can upgrade as soon as the iPhone 5 is released. This 3GS is getting old.





    Sanctions Against Iran. Cuba decries sanctions against
  • Cuba decries sanctions against



  • gglockner
    May 6, 12:45 AM
    I cannot believe that Apple would replace Intel with ARM. It would be a setback to the Mac: virtually everything would become incompatible once again. Remember how long it took the larger developers to create Universal versions of applications: Microsoft Office and Adobe CS.

    The previous two transitions (680x0 -> PPC and PPC -> x86) weren't so painful if for no other reason than the install base was far smaller.

    And putting ARM as a secondary processor so that Macs can run iOS apps? There's absolutely no need - x86 Macs can already run iOS apps well inside the iPhone emulator that comes with Xcode. The x86 processors are more than capable of emulating an ARM processor.





    Sanctions Against Iran. Topic: Iran#39;s nuclear program
  • Topic: Iran#39;s nuclear program



  • Sam*
    Jul 21, 03:08 PM
    i think the macbook should get the chips with 2 MB of shared L2 cache,

    and the pro's get the chips with 4 MB of shared L2 cache

    There will be then a difference between the two models (is having 4mb of shared L2 cache a lot better than 2mb? i have no idea but i presume it is)

    or perhaps just let the blackbook have the 2.0ghz chip with 4mb of shared l2 cache to compensate for them charging for colour





    Sanctions Against Iran. sanctions against Iran
  • sanctions against Iran



  • ender78
    Aug 11, 02:44 PM
    what are the apple guys gonna' do with the mac mini! Im in the market for one w/edu discount! I'm waiting boys! What processors would you think the mac mini will adopt? End of core solo?

    I think the mini is the worst performing machine they have on the market [it does use the slowest processors]. I am expecting an accross the board upgrade [MB, MBP, iMac, mini]. At the very least, higher end Yonas in the mini. I can also see Apple making the mini a BTO model like the MBP. That really simplifies the order process for the customer.





    Sanctions Against Iran. sanctions” against Iran
  • sanctions” against Iran



  • robby818
    Mar 28, 11:20 AM
    I've been poking along with a 3GS since they came out. Really want to switch to Verizon. This rumor puts people like me in a serious pickle: keep waiting and waiting and waiting for iPhone 5 to come out this year, if it even does it all, or grab an iPhone 4 now - a phone that has been out for nearly a year - and get burned in a couple of months by a surprise iPhone 5 announcement in June?

    Here's what I did. I'm already a Verizon customer. I bought a new sealed iPhone 4 16GB out of contract for $450 on craigslist. I plan on re-selling the iPhone 4 for at least $250 when I get my iPhone 5. $200 is worth it to me to be on the iPhone right now for the next few months. Since January, I have had a sweet unlimited text/data promo plan on Verizon but wasn't taking full advantage of it because my old phones were so bad (env3 and palm pixi plus). With the iphone I feel like I am really using the services that i am paying for.





    Sanctions Against Iran. sanctions against Iran
  • sanctions against Iran



  • LeighAnna Jones
    Mar 29, 04:13 PM
    Thousands of people are dying in Japan and all you idiots care about is iPod Touch batteries? That's kind of... selfish.





    Sanctions Against Iran. sanctions against Iran
  • sanctions against Iran



  • Full of Win
    Apr 20, 12:49 AM
    I wonder if AT&T will bump up the upgrade window? Mine is in Jan 2012, which would be ~4 months shy of the release date for the phone.





    Sanctions Against Iran. sanctions against Iran
  • sanctions against Iran



  • nuckinfutz
    May 7, 03:31 PM
    Yes, you're right. Novelty, not nostalgia. My brain is a little fried afta writin my dissertation.

    How is it a novelty?

    MobileMe doesn't even work right now... how would they ever support way more users?

    Works fine here.





    Sanctions Against Iran. new sanctions against Iran
  • new sanctions against Iran



  • ScoopOZ
    Nov 27, 12:37 AM
    I have just been told that on a Sunday from home, Todd Rutherford, Microsoft�s e-Home Program Manager at Microsoft in Seattle contacted an Australian Company that is working on wireless speakers for Apple asking them for information.

    He claims that Microsoft is "keen to get everything they can on Apples e home activities including media centres, wireless initiatives and tablet PC initiatives.

    Does anyone know of any third party Companies in the US that have lodged patents for Apple related home entertainment technology?

    I know who to talk to in Taiwan but I am keen to chase down the US firms that are working with Apple on new home entertainment automation.

    I am also told that Apple is working on an open standard type technology for the home that other Companies can license.





    Sanctions Against Iran. Sanctions against Iran failed:
  • Sanctions against Iran failed:



  • Full of Win
    Apr 18, 04:02 PM
    Where is the logical place for a dock? At the bottom (no brainer--do you want to turn your device sideways or upside down?). Grid is the most efficient layout. How else are you going to lay them out?

    Delete is a little similar, but it is one of the easiest ways to delete something. You can't exactly right click and going to the menu to delete apps seems innefficient.

    Palm and Microsoft put their icons in a grid pattern that Apple COPIED with iOS. I don't see them (or their patent holders in the case of Palm) suing. Apple is acting like a baby because they can see what it coming (more open ecosystems, less expensive options) and they know it will mean a loss of power and money.

    Perhaps you need to actually look at an iPhone 3GS and a Galaxy Tab sometime.

    http://www.coated.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Samsung-Galaxy-Tab-back.jpg

    http://phonerpt.com/wp-content/uploads/iphone-3g-white-live-picture.jpg

    OMG, Samsung put a white back on the back of their tablet. Cats sleeping with dogs! Your so-called proof is a joke.





    Sanctions Against Iran. New Sanctions Against Iran
  • New Sanctions Against Iran



  • Eldiablojoe
    May 4, 08:44 PM
    Can you give the non-storybook reason for why he died and what actually happened?

    I get that we encountered a monster, and via a random.org assignment, the monster took his 1HP/1AP and took out Wilmer. Rhon then attacked the 1 HP/0AP monster and vanquished the goblin into eternity.

    Anyhow, that's how I understand this just went down. FWIW.

    Dante.





    Sanctions Against Iran. sanctions against Iran
  • sanctions against Iran



  • syc23
    Apr 26, 03:53 PM
    Fiat owns 85% of Ferrari.
    Volkswagen owns 49.9% of Porsche.

    Yes I know that they operate under their parent group so what's your point? I salute you for having the ability to google that information.





    Sanctions Against Iran. New Sanctions Against Iran
  • New Sanctions Against Iran



  • iScott428
    Mar 28, 10:39 AM
    I can not wait any longer, I need a new Iphone this summer! Please Apple do not make me wait any longer, my white 3gs is beginning to turn gray and the back is destroyed by my standards. Please bring back the metal backing, the mock up that looks like a mini ipad 3g would be outstanding!





    Sanctions Against Iran. Image. Graphic outlining the
  • Image. Graphic outlining the



  • nefan65
    Mar 28, 10:10 AM
    I know this is a rumor board, and this is just rumor. However, do other tire of these loose shots in the dark? I mean, I understand if they hear something, and want to get folks information. But why not try and do a little investigation, to be sure?

    I dunno...guess I'm of the belief "I'll believe it when I see it"?





    Sanctions Against Iran. new sanctions against Iran
  • new sanctions against Iran



  • GGJstudios
    Jan 12, 10:42 AM
    I'yes I'm a Mac user, and yes it has detected files with problems.
    What kind of problems, exactly? Windows malware? Mac malware?





    Sanctions Against Iran. US sanctions against Iran
  • US sanctions against Iran



  • Unspeaked
    Aug 11, 01:40 PM
    I guess your point is that Apple agrees with YOU, right?

    No, my point is that I think Apple will continue to do what it's always done, and that those arguing that they'll suddenly treat product announcements differently just because their chips are now supplied by Intel are only speculating.

    I admit I'm speculating as well, but my speculation is based on Apple's known prior history, while other's is based on their wet dreams of Core 2 Duo MacBooks, which they've been wanting since before the *original* MacBook was even announced, and which they'll probably complain about once they're actually released anyway, and hold off for the next gen chips.

    ::sigh::





    Sanctions Against Iran. of sanctions against Iran
  • of sanctions against Iran



  • tribalogical
    May 6, 01:27 AM
    My first reaction to the headline was, "Oh no, not again..." (having already weathered both the OS9 -> OSX and PowerPC -> Intel x86 transitions)...

    But after that initial groan, a few other (more positive?) considerations came to mind.

    First, Apple really did do a great job of transitioning from PPC to Ix86... it was far less painful than it could have been. Not perfect, but incredibly well-managed.

    Now, OSX Lion is coming, and it appears to contain the beginnings of a convergence and consolidation between iOS and OSX. If we try to imagine where those OS's will be, say, 3 years out (and the hardware as well), by THAT time, it may be as simple as flipping a switch and hey-presto, you're on an ARM device without missing a beat...

    I say this because, as devices like iPad evolve over the next few years, the applications written for them will also, and by the time 'higher end devices' like desktops and laptops are lining up for a platform change, those "mobile" app versions will already be 'full featured', and already written for ARM-based devices (I'll use the current Garageband pair - with cross-compatible OSX/iOS versions - as a very early-market example of that future). So, the painful prospect of rewriting/recompiling all your code won't be nearly as bad as it was for the OS9->X transition.

    Another consideration is that tomorrow's mobile devices will be far more powerful than even today's desktop/laptops are. It's harder to imagine the future of the desktop/laptop as we know them today.

    In fact, now would probably be a good time to remember that what Jobs is creating here isn't just "magical devices"... he's embarked on defining the "Post PC Era"...

    It'll be interesting to see where all this leads, but my take on it is that it might not even feel much like a "platform switch" by the time we arrive there...





    Lesser Evets
    Mar 28, 10:16 AM
    Good RUMOR. Maybe it should be called a lie, but we won't know until June.

    About time Apple released a new iMac, btw.





    Chundles
    Aug 3, 12:36 AM
    You gonna call them liars?

    Yeah, why not. They're liars.

    And the Core 2 processor is a bad processor, it's got "2" in the name and sequels always suck.

    To be honest MM, time you took a chill pill and had a nice lie-down.





    R0bert
    Nov 23, 04:55 PM
    http://aycu26.webshots.com/image/6825/2003902622332125549_rs.jpg





    appleguy123
    Apr 10, 02:38 AM
    My Ti-nspire converted this problem into I'm going to use words to avoid confusion: forty-eight halves times 12 is equal to two hundred eighty eight.
    I'm going to ask my ingenious math teacher about this on Monday, and I'll report back with the answer.





    islanders
    Jul 23, 11:01 PM
    Not likely.

    In the "old days" (i.e. pre-Intel) Apple could do this, keep selling outdated technology to clear out inventory before updating processors, graphics cards/chips, etc.

    They had no other choice� g3 or g4.


    But now that they're competing head-to-head with PC technology, this won't EVER happen. It was not accidental that Yonah debuted on MBP's before Dell, HP and Sony started selling them. No, Apple will have them out of the chute as soon as anyone else does (Intel probably won't give Apple first dibs this time - that was probably a Yonah bribe to get Apple to commit to Intel), which means there's no way we'll be waiting until Christmas (unless some production snafu makes EVERYONE wait that long.)

    Announcement in August, shipping in September maybe?

    :cool:

    iBorg



    September �maybe� is not to far from November!

    Someone had to take a pragmatic position. Might as well be me.

    Ok. Merom is going to happen for MBP September (maybe), October and Novermber (probably) December (maybe).

    However, it has always been my conviction that not even Apple knows these exact dates. If sales are strong they put off updates, if they are slack they roll out new stuff.

    This time Intel jumped the gun so Apple may take longer to respond.